weather

Embracing Clouds in the Night Sky

­­Everybody loves a clear night sky. It can be existential to feel the draw of an endless dome of stars, take in a brilliant Milky Way or be fortunate enough to catch a dazzling display of northern lights. Across the globe, photographers and non-photographers alike marvel at the magic of the night.

What then do we do when clouds move into our star-filled nights? Give up and go home? Heck no. We can change our approach. Embrace the clouds! They can be every bit as magical as the Milky Way or a display of auroras.

Faroe Islands. Nikon Z 6II with a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens at 27mm. 2 minutes, f/22, ISO 80.

Shifting Gears

One of the greatest pitfalls of landscape and astro-landscape photography is getting stuck on pre-conceived ideas. You may enter each night with an idea of exactly what you’ll see and how you’ll photograph it. This comes from being flooded with imagery from the most iconic places across the world captured under the most perfect conditions. So as we are getting ready to head out, we have already envisioned how our shots will look, and that is exactly what we expect and hope to happen.

So when the clouds roll in, obscuring our beloved stars, it’s time to shift gears. It’s really just a simple matter of moving your mindset from needing to capture a clear night sky to allowing yourself to experiment with the conditions above you. Don’t get caught in “I have to recreate this scene as I have seen it before”—instead embrace “What would it look like if I tried this?”

This mindset could be applied to most types of photography, and indeed it’s a worthwhile consideration for many situations. But for now, let’s focus on clouds at night. Once you pivot from preconceived notions, it’s easy to begin to experiment.

I was expecting to capture circumpolar star trails over Park Avenue in Arches National Park when the clouds set in. Shifting gears, I exposed for 5 minutes instead of a full hour, which would have resulted in very few stars and blanket of clouds. Nikon D4S with Nikon 16mm f/2.8 fisheye lens. 5 minutes, f/2.8, ISO 400.

Knowing that the clouds were sticking around all night, I chose to spend my time light painting this scene in Big Bend National Park rather than concentrating on the sky. Notice that the light-painted foreground dominates the scene while the sky is relegated to being the secondary subject. Nikon Z 6 with a Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 lens at 14mm. 3 minutes, f/8, ISO 800.

Creating Cloud Trails

You can use clouds moving across a dark sky during a long exposure to create a very dynamic image.

For starters, try different shutter speeds. In some cases a 30-second exposure might do the trick, while in others you might need a 3-minute exposure to achieve the desired look.

Stopping down to f/10 from our typical wide nighttime apertures of f/2.8 or f/4 allowed me to expose for 2 minutes. This in turn provided time for me to light paint the moai of Rapa Nui (Easter Island). Nikon D4S with a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens at 60mm. 2 minutes, f/10, ISO 200.

It’s hard to say what shutter speed is best, because it varies in different conditions. Try different speeds to determine what may look best in your current situation. In the following example I tried multiple shutter speeds when shooting the Múlafossur Falls in the Faroe Islands.

Múlafossur Falls, Faroe Islands. Nikon Z 6II with a Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 lens at 18mm. f/14, ISO 50.

Since we are more concerned with the look of the clouds as opposed to getting pinpoint stars, we have more leeway in our exposure times.

For example, many folks think that night skies should be captured only at either a relatively short shutter speed (8-15 seconds) to render the stars as points or a very long shutter speed (15 minutes or more) to render them as long trails. While this is sound practice for clear skies, the presence of clouds allows for more flexibility. The main consideration here is the look of the clouds rather than the length of the star trails. Even a shorter speed of 2 minutes renders the stars as small streaks and is enough to let the viewer know the image was made at night.

Faroe Islands. Short exposures of 6, 8 or 10 seconds typically render the clouds as an awkward blur. The stars may be points, but the blur of the clouds is not enough to render a surreal quality. This exposure appears to be a mistake as the clouds are not sharp enough or blurry enough. Nikon Z 6II with a Nikon 24-70mm f/2 lens at 27mm. 6 seconds, f/2.8, ISO 6400.

A 1- minute exposure gives the clouds enough time to streak across the sky. Nikon Z 6II with a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens at 27mm. 1 minute, f/4, ISO 400.

Clouds as a Compositional Element

Once we begin to add clouds into our photographs (day or night), we need to start thinking about them as an important compositional element. Their structure and placement within the frame are important. The cloud streaks will read as lines, and therefore we consider them just as we would any other lines in a photograph.

Horizontal lines crossing the frame from left to right or right to left tend to have more of a calming effect. They seem to be more at rest. Since these types of lines don’t add a lot of energy, they require a dominant foreground as a contrast, or you could further the calm mood by choosing a more subtle foreground.

Horizontal lines tend to have a calming effect as they streak over dynamic Miami. Nikon D4S with a Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 lens at 70mm. 30 seconds, f/10, ISO 800 (foreground) and 3 minutes, f/10, ISO 160 (sky), blended in Adobe Photoshop.

Diagonal lines and converging lines have much more visual energy. They are caused when clouds are moving directly at us (converging) or just off to our right or left (diagonal). This type of cloud movement can become very dramatic elements in our compositions. The use of wide- and superwide-angle lenses helps accentuate these lines.

Clouds moving from the lower left of the frame to the upper right create diagonal lines over the Chisos Basin in Big Bend National Park. Nikon Z 6 with a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens at 24mm. 2 minutes, f/11, ISO 800.

Converging lines are created when the clouds are moving directly at you as in this scene from Glacier National Park. Nikon Z 6 with a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens at 24mm. 3 minutes, f/4, ISO 200.

Bettering Your Odds

Since our clouds will play such an important role in our final composition and it’s nearly impossible to predict the final look of an exposure, it’s important to shoot lots of frames.

I begin by experimenting with shutter speed. Once I find a shutter speed that renders the clouds in a manner I find complementary to the rest of the scene, it’s time to shoot that same shutter speed over and over again. Each frame will capture the clouds in a different position, so by shooting more frames, we increase the chance of getting a pleasing position for the clouds.

I shot the following photos at the same exposure. Notice how the clouds complement the scene more in some frames than in others.

Nikon Z 6II with a Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens at 33mm. 30 seconds, f/20, ISO 50.

Cloud Height and Moon

Another consideration when creating cloud streaks is the moon phase and location. Clouds in the night sky will be greatly enhanced with some moonlight. If there is no moon or city lights to illuminate them, the clouds will be far less visible and tend to simply obscure our sky rather than add an interesting element. A quarter to full moon is a good time to capture cloud trails over the landscape.

The full moon to camera left illuminated the clouds as well as Going to the Sun Mountain in Glacier National Park. Nikon D850 with a Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 lens at 21mm. 6 minutes, f/4, ISO 100.

Shooting straight into the full moon over Lady Boot Arch in the Alabama Hills of California. Nikon D4S with a Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 lens at 14mm. 4 minutes, f/5.6, ISO 200.

Cloud type and height can vary dramatically, as will the effect in the resulting photographs. Lower-elevation clouds have a much stronger impact on the composition than higher-elevation clouds. The higher clouds tend to become more transparent during long exposures. This type of cloud can be a subtle element in your final frame.

High clouds can be a subtle element when long exposures render them as more transparent, as seen in this photo from Zion National Park. Nikon D4 with a Nikon 24mm f/2.8 lens. 4 minutes, f/5.6, ISO 200.

Where to Find the ‘Best’ Clouds

Where can you find clouds? Anywhere, really. But those dramatic low clouds are more common the closer you get to the poles—that is, generally regions closer to the Arctic and Antarctic tend to have more low clouds, and the regions closer to the tropics tend to have more high clouds.

You’ll also find more low clouds around the ocean. This is why I love doing cloud photography in places like the Faroe Islands, where we’re running a workshop this coming May. Not only is Faroe close to the ocean (being a remote island, after all), but it’s also at a relatively northern latitude. That combination can make for nights filled with dramatic low clouds racing across the beautiful landscapes. You can see that in many of the photos accompanying this post.

High clouds are fun to work with too, so if you like that effect, know that you’re more likely to see them as you get to locations either closer to the equator or more inland from the ocean.

And of course you’re more likely to see low clouds in the mountains—because you’re at a higher elevation, closer to the clouds!

Post-Processing

Simply capturing the clouds may not be the end of the process. Often we’ll need to enhance them in Lightroom to bring out their true drama.

A common technique is to create a mask for the sky and increase Dehaze. This will add the needed overall contrast to the sky that brings out the structure of the clouds. However, along with this contrast comes a deeper saturation and darkening of the whole sky. The simple fix is when increasing the Dehaze slider, follow up with decreasing Saturation and increasing Exposure.

For this image from Faroe Islands, I created a sky mask in Lightroom and increased Dehaze to +55. This oversatured the blues and darkened the entire sky, so, still within the sky mask, I increased Exposure to +1.00 and decreased Saturation to -25.

Wrapping Up

I hope this gives you some motivation to stay out even when the sky isn’t clear. Don’t pack it up and go home when the clouds roll in. Embrace them! Experiment with different shutter speeds and lots of frames to create those beautiful cloud streaks across your night skies.

If this inspires you to shoot clouds at night (or if you’re already doing it), then we’d love to see the results! Share in the comments below, or on our Facebook page, or on Instagram (tag us @nationalparksatnight #nationalparksatnight #seizethenight).

Tim Cooper is a partner and workshop leader with National Parks at Night. Learn more techniques from his book The Magic of Light Painting, available from Peachpit.

UPCOMING WORKSHOPS FROM NATIONAL PARKS AT NIGHT

Five Questions: Moon Lenses, Smoky Summer Landscapes, Noise Tests and More

We get a lot of questions. We hope we have a lot of answers. Today, at least, we have the same number of each. Five, to be specific. Five questions from night photographers just like you, and five answers from the five of us.

If you have any questions you would like to throw our way for a future Five Questions blog post, please contact us anytime. Questions could be about gear, national parks or other photo locations, post-processing techniques, field etiquette, or anything else related to night photography. #SeizeTheNight!

1. Moon Lenses

The moon rising over Mesquite Flat Dunes, Death Valley National Park. Nikon D750, Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8. Dunes light painted with a Coast HP5R flashlight. © 2016 Lance Keimig.

The moon rising over Mesquite Flat Dunes, Death Valley National Park. Nikon D750, Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8. Dunes light painted with a Coast HP5R flashlight. © 2016 Lance Keimig.

Q: I wanted to get a shot of the recent super blue moon full lunar eclipse, but I wasn’t sure which lens would be a good one to use. I wanted to get the moon as part of the landscape, with an in-camera shot (rather than just a zoomed shot of the moon). It would have been OK if the moon wasn’t super huge in my shot—I just wanted a nice overall image. This was with my Nikon D750, and I have a 70-200mm lens. For the next time, should I rent something zoomier (a 200-500mm)?  — Tracy W.B.

A: Lens choice questions are really hard to answer. So much depends on the shot that you have in mind. We recommend using PhotoPills (see their website or in-app links for tutorials and ideas) to plan your shot if you have a location in mind, and then plan your strategy from there. If you don’t have a specific location in mind, then start by thinking about places you could shoot with a good view of the moonrise, figure out exactly where the moonrise will be using PhotoPills, and do some test shots beforehand to see which focal length will work best.

You shouldn’t need to rent a lens since you don’t have a specific shot in mind. Instead, build a shot around the lens you already have! — Lance

2. Cords vs. L-Brackets

Q: When I shoot in portrait orientation with my L-bracket on, I have the problem of not having access to my USB port to connect a remote release, since it is on the left side of the camera where the mounting bracket also is. Do you know of a way to solve that issue? — Michael M.

Custom-designed L-brackets (such as the Kirk model for the Nikon D750, pictured here) allow the photographer to access all the jacks, ports, controls and so on.

A: I love that you’re using an L-bracket! I could barely survive on a shoot without mine. But yes, I understand your issue, as it’s one I’ve had.

First, if you’re using a generic L-bracket, that could certainly cause this issue. Generic models have the advantage of being less expensive. But the more-expensive custom models (such as those made by Really Right Stuff and Kirk Photo) are designed for specific camera bodies. One of the advantages is that space is left around each jack and port, so you should have ready access to plug in anything you want.

However, that doesn’t mean you can’t still run into problems. For instance, on my Nikon D3s with the Kirk L-bracket attached, I can’t connect a proprietary power cable to an external battery because of the way the plug is designed. Another example is exactly what’s happening to you: Plugs that stick straight out from the jack (rather than at a right angle) might not work when the L-bracket is mounted to a tripod head vertically (which kinda defeats the reason for using the bracket).

I suggest contacting the manufacturer of the accessory you’re trying to plug in and asking if they can supply or recommend an alternative cable. Or, if the accessory is the cable, only buy one with that right-angle-type connector.

Ironically enough, this could also be a case where a generic L-bracket could serve you better; one that’s designed a little taller than your camera could allow enough space to mount the vertically oriented body off-center, providing room for your connector underneath, out of the way of the tripod head. — Chris

3. Wildfires and Smoke in the Northwest U.S.

Q: My experience living in the Pacific Northwest is that, over the past four to five summers, forest fires in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and British Columbia have produced serious haze conditions for both day and night photography in July, August and September. You’re doing a workshop in Glacier National Park this summer. How would you adjust shooting for this possibility? — Dave E.

A: Yes, the past couple of years have been kind of smoky up here! I live in Montana, so I know what you mean.

However, I have been visiting Glacier National Park in summer for over 20 years and have been unable to make images only a couple of times. The images below are from last summer during the height of the fire season and during the infamous Sprague Fire in Glacier that burned down the Sperry Chalet. (Which, incidentally, is being rebuilt!)

Night photos in Glacier National Park during the 2017 Sprague Fire. Nikon D4s. © 2017 Tim Cooper.

That’s not to say there is no risk, but wind conditions, locations of fires, etc., play such a big part. It’s really hard to guess when fires will happen and when they will inhibit photography.

That being said, if I did run into an abundance of smoke, I would be looking all over the park and surrounding areas for clearer skies. All of us at National Parks at Night love light painting, full-moon shooting and all types of night photography. Shooting the Milky Way and star trails is just one part of what we focus on, so smoke certainly wouldn’t make us pack up the cameras for the night. I’ve been in many situations where the skies were overcast and the image-making was great due to other aspects of the scene. — Tim

4. Intervalometers for Fuji X-T Bodies

Q: I recently attended one of Matt’s speaking engagements and it definitely sparked an interest to experiment with some night photography in the coming months. I have a Fuji X-T2 kit that includes a 10-24mm lens, along with a nice stable tripod. I’m planning to purchase an intervalometer cable release next week. Have you used a wired or wireless intervalometer shutter release with an X-T2 with success? — Elliot R.

A: Yup. There are two intervalometers that I find work well with the X-T2. For a wired model, I recommend the Vello ShutterBoss II (ignore that it says it’s for Canon—it also works with your Fuji!). For wireless, I recommend (surprise!) the Vello Wireless ShutterBoss II.

I use the wired model all the time with my X-T1 for time-lapses. Gabe uses an X-T2 with the same wired release.

However, before choosing, I do recommend considering the pros and cons of a wired versus wireless intervalometer. See my 2017 blog post “Remote Question: Wireless or Wired Intervalometers for Camera Triggering?” — Matt

5. Noise With Varying-Quality Cameras

A side-by-side comparison of ISO 100 (left) and ISO 51,200 (right) images from a camera noise test.

Q: In the descriptions of your workshops you say to know your DSLR or high-end mirrorless, but I’m not sure what is considered “high-end.” I have a Sony Alpha a6000. I have tried a few times doing night photography using that with a Samyang 12mm f/2. I also see you guys mention full-frame; how important is full-frame versus crop sensor when doing night photography? I have seen amazing night photography pictures using the Sony a6000. — Kylee W.

A: While there are plenty of crop-sensor cameras that do well with night photography, I have found the a6000 and a6300 get rather noisy with long exposures. But everything is definitely subjective, and my tolerance for noise might be less than yours. The best advice I would offer is to test your camera, figure out how noisy it gets and establish your own parameters. You can run this test either in the field or in the comfort of your home.

Take a picture of something that has shadows in it (because noise appears in the shadow areas first). Put your camera on a tripod and take a series of shots at ISOs of 1600, 3200, 6400, etc.

Then (and, for this, you might have to turn your lights low and stop down your ISO and apertures), do a series of images at various shutter speeds: 15 seconds, 30 seconds, 1 minute, 2 minutes. ... Keep doubling your time and adjust your ISO and apertures (or lighting), and end at somewhere around 8 minutes.

Do these tests with your camera’s noise reduction features off, and then again with the noise reduction features on. See if that makes a difference.

Download the images to your computer and inspect them at 100 percent. Look for two things:

  1. When your image gets too grainy for your taste, that is the ISO that you will want to avoid.
  2. In your long-exposure images, look for red, purple and other colored specks. That is color noise from the long exposures. Again, determine the ISO at which that becomes unacceptable to you.

This test will help you establish the parameters in which you can successfully operate your camera (according to your own tastes) with both the high ISOs and the long shutter speeds that are needed for most night photography.

If you’d like to see a more detailed rundown on how to perform a high ISO test, along with sample images, see our 2016 blog post “Keep The Noise Down: How To Take An ISO Test With Your Camera.” — Gabriel

Chris Nicholson is a partner and workshop leader with National Parks at Night, and author of Photographing National Parks (Sidelight Books, 2015). Learn more about national parks as photography destinations, subscribe to Chris' free e-newsletter, and more at www.PhotographingNationalParks.com.

UPCOMING WORKSHOPS FROM NATIONAL PARKS AT NIGHT